Photo: L. Weikel
Words Matter
I imagine many of us are still trying to get our bearings as to what country we woke up in this morning. Talk about whipsawed emotions and prospects. The outcome of the Georgia Senate run-off election is how we started the day (although we weren’t sure about Ossoff’s victory until later in the day). But then, oh look. By shortly after noon we were witnessing a debacle, a travesty – an appalling tidal wave of conspiracy-minded people swarming the sacred ground of our Capitol and defiling chambers and Congressional offices. The thing is, words matter. So I’m offering this post as a service to help us accurately assess what we are witnessing.
A lot of different words have been bantied about to describe today’s events. It’s an affront to all of us to dignify the heinous actions of both our current president’s speech and the events immediately following that speech, with the words such as ‘protest’ and ‘protesters.’ No, we need to dig a little deeper into our lexicons.
Black’s Law Dictionary
I happen to have a vestige of my first profession easily accessible in my living room bookcase, my copy of Black’s Law Dictionary*. It seems like an appropriate tome from which to derive some accurate definitions of what I believe we may have witnessed today. Let’s see:
Insurrection. A rebellion, or rising of citizens or subjects in resistance to their government. Insurrection consists in any combined resistance to the lawful authority of the state, with intent to cause the denial thereof, when the same is manifested, or intended to be manifested, by acts of violence. It is a federal crime to incite, assist, or engage in a rebellion or insurrection against the United States. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2383. See also Internal security acts.
Although I’m not about to parse the definitions I’m providing the way we’re taught in law school, I’m confident in the abilities of you, my readers, to break these down enough into their components to get the gist that yes, there is a good chance federal crimes were committed today by a number of individuals. It’s wise to note that, besides those who actually participated in any such rebellion or uprising, those who incited it are also culpable. Food for thought.
Another Couple of Definitions
Another word we occasionally hear (and may hear more often now) and for which I thought you might find a definition helpful in your reflections on what we witnessed today is sedition.
Sedition. Communication or agreement which has as its objective the stirring up of treason or certain lesser commotions, or the defamation of the government. Sedition is advocating, or with knowledge of its contents knowingly publishing, selling or distributing any document which advocates, or, with knowledge of its purpose, knowingly becoming a member of any organization which advocates the overthrow or reformation of the existing form of government of this state by violence or unlawful means. An insurrectionary movement tending towards treason, but wanting an overt act; attempts made by meetings or speeches, or by publications, to disturb the tranquility of the state. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 2383 et seq.; see also Alien and sedition laws; Smith Act.
Two ancillary definitions you might find interesting:
Seditious libel. A communication written with the intent to incite the people to change the government otherwise than by lawful means, or to advocate the overthrow of the overnment by force or violence. Smith Act, 18 U.S.C.A § 2385. See Alien and sedition laws.
Seditious speech. Oral advocacy of the overthrow of the government by force or violence.
And Finally
Treason. The offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power. Treason consists of two elements: Adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort. Cramer v. U.S., U.S.N.Y., 325 U.S. 1, 65 S.Ct. 918, 932, 89 L.Ed. 1441. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 2381. A person can be convicted of treason only on the testimony of two witnesses, or confession in open court. Art. III, Sec. 3, U.S. Constitution.
I confess that I would have to read the specific wording of 18 U.S.C.A. 2381, but the action described in the first clause of the definition as written above sure has a familiar ring to it.
Words Matter
In the coming days and weeks, I have a feeling there will be attempts to draw a lot of false equivalencies to the actions that took place today and actual protests and marches that took place earlier this year. When words of art are used, it’s helpful to have definitions before us that we can reference. I hope this is helpful. May you use them wisely and judiciously.
*affiliate link
(T-324)